Saturday 3 February 2018

Is Painting Racist?

Recently a page came up in my newsfeed articulating quite well that veganism is racist. Of course, this is an interesting argument, and it stems from the idea that in order to grow and harvest produce certain populations are exploited. Cash crops like quinoa that are a staple of diets in tropical climes, sustaining the hungry population, are now stripped off the earth and sent to Waitrose. All over the world non whites are paid a pittance to harvest our everyday essentials like tea, coffee, cocoa and sugar. Its hard to tell whether "Fairtrade" is a real thing or a marketing gimmick, but the way of supplying our groceries has not changed much since colonial times. This was the argument that the page espoused, however, it may have been charged with social justice and identity politics (such is life online), but it originated in the US. Mexicans, Afro Caribbeans and other People Of Colour have long been exploited over there in the growing of tobacco, cotton and foodstuffs, but in the UK things are slightly different, although still racist, it is more to do with other kinds of vulnerable cheap labour that can exploited, such as Eastern Europeans: white, but maybe less so..
So, if our staples in the Western World are produced by the exploitation of The Other, where does that leave painting?
Even before we get onto the subject of cotton and its story, lets think about the pigments that came about when artists were still painting on plaster and wooden board.
Before the advent of petrochemicals and the manufacturing processes that bring about our modern day paint colours, pigments were derived from minerals and exotic animals. The cochineal insect and the precious Lapis Lazuli blue stone are not to be found in this country, so where did they come from? Who was searching for the beetles and gathering them up to be turned into red paint? What poor souls were in the mines in dreadful conditions hacking away lumps of Lapis and Gold for artists to embellish their religious iconography? I would guess native and poor populations were exploited, and I hope to find out more about the provenance of pigments.
Now lets talk Cotton.. Cotton has been problematic historically and it is well documented. The harvesting of cotton by black slaves still leaves an ugly social scar to this day. But whence the canvas and calico painters used as a surface? , for that matter, does linen come from?
Whether to decorate or document, the surface and the pigments have a hidden story all of their own, and artists were either blissfully or willingly to confront this in their work.
Now of course, we face a different dilemma. In order that we have paint, we must have pigments, and if you are using acrylic, plastic body. Much of these ingredients come from the petrochemical industry. Oil paintings may have a vegetable oil carrier, but what are the manufacturing and cultivating processes of this bulk of plant based oil? We know that intensive farming and the petrochemical industry contribute to global warming, and the effects of climate change on poorer less resourced communities, so is painting still a viable, ethical practise for the artist in the 21st century?

For Those Who Have Been Blessed By God

I thought long and hard before posting this, in face it has taken me a few years. Partly because I have been procrastinating, or been too busy running workshops, making new work, and networking; but mainly the reason was I do not wish to offend.
You have to be very careful what you post on the internet these days. People will have a visceral personal reaction to something you might consider an interesting dialogue, or even incocuous. In the 21st Century everyone belongs to a minority, whether it be right wing, left wing, religious, atheist, vegan, disabled, neurodiverse, black, brown or whatever. Everyone has the internet directly at their fingertips, living in the here and now, on the edge of emotion, with behavourial fillters swept away by anonymity.. allowing passions to rage free. The equivalent of throwing cat shit over a neighbours fence.
So, with all that in mind, and because I am a Socially Aware individual and artist, although some extremists would dispute that (they are basically playground sneerers and bullies at the end of the day) I am going to state my intent and reflection for this ceramic creation as follows:

For Those Who Have Been Blessed By God
This was a title that came to me actaully after making these ceramic sculptures.
They are irregular, fragile, insecure. Sometimes they fell apart during construction and the stress of handling, gravity, and exposure to extremes (high temperatues in the kiln, sudeen heat and dryness).
Mostly they are imperfect. And organic, with their own construction, much like neural networks building up or a body developing from fetus.
In society, especially in those religious groups, people with healthy happy children or great careers and household call themselves "blessed". They have the upper hand. If they have succeeded and everything is perfect, they publicly thank an imaginary diety, but really they are boasting. This is not just a 21st century phenomenon, it has reared its head in literature throughout the ages. To be perfect, and to be wealthy, is to be favoured and endowed. Sinners suffer poverty and illmess through their own doings. Its as prevalent an attitude today as it has ever been. Does this person deserve state assistenace..?
On the otherside of the spectrum are those who are parents or sufferers themselves of disability or mental defiecency. Those (like myself) who are "imperfect", "broken", "wrong". They may identify as blessed bacause of the the quirks that their state of mental or physical difference endows them with. Parents of Downs Syndrome children talk of their warmth and affection. Sufferers of ADHD talk of their amazing ideas, people with Autism often have gifts of mathematics or drawing. Depressives have deep insight. Anxious people will empahise and bond with the vulnerable and lonesome.
So this work celebtate all that is "WRONG" or "imperfect" within humanity.
It is to tell people who are perfect and flawless and blessed that we imprefrct and flawed can also be blessed. And they have to shre the world with us, see us for what we are, all higgedlt piggedly, whther they like it or not. We irregylars are there, and we will be recognised, not euthenised.

Monday 28 October 2013

The Nearly Morning Pages Every So Often

I'm afraid of committing words to paper. There, I've admitted it. Paper scares me. The computer screen is OK but the paper page is like a blank canvas - once you have violated that purity and positioned yourself on the sublime infininate white space that is it, no going back, no erasing. On a computer, its very very different. You can delete and amend to your heart's content. Re-write, re-frame, save, edit, draft, edit again, read it, swap it around, destroy everything if you like, write it all again, then finally publish. It's a cowards way of writing, really, but its better than nothing!
The computer allows you time, but can remove sponteniety. It does however encourage parallel thinking. Halfway through you can wander off and research a subject or find a replacement word or even world, and get lost in the internet - but the danger to cut and paste other people's ideas is then very present. You may lose yourself along the way.
In "The Artists Way" the emphasis is on the writer/creators own authentic and unedited ideas, and thus writing on paper is crucial. There really is no substitute to unfettered free-association and scribbling. You can write in the lines, in the margins, create your own concrete poetry and have no lines at all. You are not limited to the serial process in this repect, as one line does not necesarrily follow another as in the process of typing. You are present and in the moment but also leave a legacy. It will probably only be a private legacy but it belongs to you. So why should it be any more scary than writing a blog that any Tom Dick or Harriet can see? Its a barmy paradox, is what it is!
And if you dont like what you've written, there's always the shredder or the fireplace, if you really really want to "delete without recovery". But maybe mental recovery depends on the ability to recover lost documents of your existence. Hence writing. It doesn't really matter if its on paper, on screen, as long as its written down - in your own langauge be that alphbetical, musical or visual - that's all that matters. In a world where we are subdued by other people's texts and contexts, where we are assaulted by information and the simulcra (images plastered over images plastered over reality), where we cannot pick the threads out of the ropes around our necks, its even more important to reinforce our own identities with our own texts.

(By the way you might have noticed I haven't used any spellchecking here. Make of that what you will!)
                                          (ceramic scribbles)

Sunday 8 September 2013

Fruits of the Forest/Evanescent Seasons

I have now been in the Forest 1 year, 1 week, and 2 days.
A year ago I was busying myself decorating and gardening and trying to fill the void left by losing everything I had ever known in London. It took me 15 years to finally find a place in the world there, and giving it up was painful. So painful, in fact, that it manifested itself in terrible migraines that lasted for a day or 2 at a time. When I was supposed to be checking what was going on and coming off the moving van, I had to lie down, I prayed for darkness. I had to excuse myself from the relations that had come to help me and my husband, I couldn't bear the busy-ness of it all, and of course no-one excells in busy-ness more than a mother-in-law. It was all too much and I literally felt like my head was going to explode.
For the first week it was like an exciting holiday. We had our best mate down, explored the area, and tried many new beers and food in the pubs. Hub had 10 days off work. We started leisurely then knuckled down. Walls were painted, doggy smelling carpets were ripped out, and expensive cottagy wood furniture was purchased. Then he went back to work, the improvements slowed down, and problems with the house started appearing. The garden was a jungle. The central heating died. The cats got into fights. The contacts I tried to make in community arts dried up. They said they didn't need me after all.
What had this done to my creative output?
It had killed it.
I wanted to make things in the house better. I wanted to find a job. I wanted to feel as comfortable as I did before. I had no energy to create. I didn't know what I wanted to paint but I DID know I didn't want to paint twee landscapes full of bluebells and deer. I felt too urban to belong. All around me were strange accents belonging to even stranger people.
I tried sign-writing for the local steam railway. I was clearly intruding on an old boys club, and it was so cold in the machine room. I didn't feel like celebrating Christmas. I didn't have the heart for it. And the Christmas before, my dear feline friend was suddenly taken from me. It took a trip to the craft centre with my sister and buying a tree and garland there to make it more festive and heartwarming.
But the months dragged on and all I was doing was drawing and rehashing old ideas on pieces of paper, and pathetic attempts at my own style of landscape - so at least I could do something commercial. I had hopes of showing at a London gallery but they changed their mind at the last minute. My work was all packaged up and new work showed no sign of appearing. I was too frightened to work in the barn in case it all had to stop for the builders, and it was damp and had a scary rickety ladder in. I was freezing cold and all I wanted was a warm duvet, the cats, the laptop, and a bottle of good single malt.
I gritted my teeth and tried to get on - I signed up for the Open Studios to give myself some incentive to sort the barn out and make it presentable by July. I had sold a bit of work at a Christmas Craft Fair and that also gave me a little green shoot of confidence. The green shoots were so fragile and not frost proof though, the soil they were growing out of was also cold and barren.
In early spring, when I had decided not to wait for the building work and improvements to the barn and to make some work in the meantime, I took some of my inheritance and bought a kiln. I had no idea what to buy as I'd previously only ever used someone elses, and most of the times they had  done the firings for me. It was scary and exciting. My first firing went unbelievably well and this spurred me on. And, as the Open Studios approached, and I took lots of stored work out of its boxes, I was amazed at the variety of work I seemed to have produced. I even found some ceramics going back to 1994!
I had fallen out with a local artists collective in Gloucester and this had dampened my enthusiasm somewhat. I wanted to paint magpies and birds to sell there and they seemed up for this, and showed interest in my "splat" paintings. But then they decided I had no place there, and one of the artists suddenly started painting birds...
But I did the magpie paintings anyway, my rationale was that I was re-using old canvases, so it didn't matter if I messed them up. I felt detached making them though, as if trying to re-kindle an old relationship that had died due to lack of committment. My lack of skill made me feel guilty, like it was a lack of love.
What started to turn things around was working at the local museum. I put a painting in there as part of a local artists show, I didn't even get to see the other artists displaying there, only their work. The painting was a vibrant, abstract expressionist piece I'd done at Horley in the summer between 2 terms at Brighton. It was a very experimental piece and I'm surprised at the positive responses I got. One woman said she found it hard to tear herself away from it, and kept going back and looking at it. And she was just a volunteer there, not even "very arty" herself. It was wonderful to be able to communicate with this new audience, and a great and pleasing surprise. I volunteered to help with the Big Draw, and from this regular workshops began. Not paid ones, but I got so much good feedback and enthusiasm both from the museum and the public it didn't matter. It helped boost my confidence for the Open Studios. I certainly didn't care whether I sold anything or not from my studio, hoping I might flog a few spotty cats, but I ended up selling 2 paintings for quite a good amount!
I started making some more tentacle pots that I enjoyed making in Battersea. I got myself some outside support. My Mojo was returning! I made bigger and more colourful paintings. I got a page in a glossy brochure advertising my workshops at the museum.
I said goodbye to the splat painting idea by making my final one as loud and pink as it gets, ready to move on with something else. It was time to move on. That series of paintings went out with a bang, but still new followers are liking them, both on the net and in real life.
My work has always explored new areas. It would give an art therapist real food for thought! As I have got stronger as a person, my work has become more delicate. The colours have ceased to dominate the canvas, there is a lot of white space, the calm split by a slight intervention (or scar?), the ceramics has gone from thick and fleshy to thin and delicate, so fragile it looks like it could be destroyed by merely breathing on it. Maybe this is my fragility being dealt with in a literal sense, or maybe it is that I dont need to shout with my creative voice to drown out the other, more contemptuous voices within. Maybe I am becalmed, and the work shows my voice needs only to be a whisper to suggest ideas.
And I have taken up singing again.

Wednesday 28 August 2013

Spike and Stripe

A few weeks ago, just before the heavens opened and the wrath of some god poured scorn on our West Country summer, I happened to make the long awaited pilgrimage to Bristol.
I say "pilgrimage" because ever since my foundation year this city has loomed large in my conciousness as a place where urban contemporary art flourishes and that conceptual ideas are explored seriously. I used to read the Fine Art course description in the UWE prospectus and it seemed to be even more serious than Goldsmiths, considered and thoughtful reflections and applications of fine art, and my tutor at Croydon had graduated from there, and he was full of conceptual thought, although he was also full of BS. It sounded to me like an area worth visiting, as I had already visited it psychologically. It had everything I want, urbanity, water, creativity, and of course music. Little boats bobbing up and down in the middle of a city. My idea of heaven.

I did my research and decided what I wanted to visit specifically. I decided for my first trip I would go to Spike Island, as it looked like an interesting setup and reminded me a bit of the Pheonix in Brighton, another collection of artists and spaces. The area itself, on arrival, also reminded me of Hackney Wick: sluggish water, vibrant graffiti, concrete and brick and wildflowers mingling tantalising together.
The show didn't dominate the white space, as large artworks usually tend to do. It almost blended in with the planes, looking almost like a giant doodle, lines blending with lines on a big page, like somebody drawing crosshatched patterns with a set of coloured biros in a modular office cell whilst on the phone to someone tedious. Its a daydreaming kind of work, the nautical ropes and pulleys adding to that dreamlike feeling, in the open space it could just sail away like a yacht on an overcast winters day, on white mirror like water with a huge open blank pale sky. Sail away like a mind not quite on the job.
Yet in all this threadlike tranparency there was a physicality in the work, the heavy frames and the balancing weights, as you walked around them, they hung solidly and almost obstructivley, providing a view in but also obscuring it. The moire pattern was effective in the main where the 2d boxes intersected, this was rendered with mechanical precision. By contrast, the crafted pieces of the work had not quite an accurate construction. Some of the lines of rope in the frames were disturbingly uneven, if this had been a doodle on a page this would be where the pen's fluid ran suddenly thick, or if a graph in a school project, the ruler had been badly placed. It did remind me of when I had to draw bar graphs at school, in graph paper books, with fineliners. I was never very neat.
Looking at the placing of these double-thick lines I couldn't decide whether this was deliberate or a circumstance of construction. However, it was a overall a pleasing effect, the way the lines overlapped as your body and eyes moved about the space, a great game of pereception and proprioception, one that I had tried to do with the coloured gel in my MA projects, but with limited success. What I lacked was clearly ambition, something that this work had in abundance. Ambition, but with quiet confidence.